Personal Injury and Insurance Litigation
Steve is certified as a Specialist in Civil Litigation
by the Law Society of Upper Canada
Stephen, a life long resident of Burlington, is an avid sports
fan who enjoys golfing and competitive hockey. He is married with
two children.
After graduating from Law School on the Dean's Honours List in
1989, Stephen returned to Burlington and began his practice with
Martin & Hillyer. He has developed a very specialized Civil
Litigation practice representing plaintiffs in the following
areas:
- Serious Personal Injury
- Motor Vehicle Accidents and Accident Benefits Claims
- Disability and other types of insurance claims
Over the years, his practice has allowed him to appear at every
level of court in Ontario up to and including the Ontario Court of
Appeal.
In 2004 he was recognized by The Law Society of Upper Canada as
a Certified Specialist in Civil Litigation.
Stephen has enjoyed a very successful track record at trial. In
a recent 2006 decision, Madam Justice Mossip stated:
"This hearing proceeded in an exemplary manner, and counsel, no
doubt with the help of his able assistants at counsel table, has
presented a textbook case on a civil trial, in my view".
Stephen has been a guest lecturer at Osgoode Professional
Development, The Law Society of Upper Canada, Queen's University
Law School, The Ontario Trial Lawyers' Association, The Ontario Bar
Association, The Legal Education Society of Alberta, The Hamilton
Law Association and The Halton County Law Association. He has also
presented a number of papers to community groups on various civil
litigation topics.
Stephen looks forward to assisting you with any Personal Injury
or Insurance Litigation claim.
|
Education:
|
|
1981
Hillfield-Strathallan College
Honours Secondary School Graduation Diploma
1984
University of Western Ontario
Bachelor of Arts
Administrative and Commercial Studies
1986
University of Windsor
Faculty of Business
Honours Bachelor of Commerce
|
1989
University of Alberta
Faculty of Law
Bachelor of Laws
1991
Law Society of Upper Canada
Admitted to practice law as a Barrister and Solicitor
|
Memberships
- President of The Halton County Law Association
- Past Director - Ontario Trial Lawyers Association
- The Law Society of Upper Canada
- Association of Trial Lawyers of America
- Canadian Bar Association
Presentations
- Queens Law School - Surviving the first year of practice -
March 29th, 1993
- Halton Women's Centre - Limitations and Sexual Assault -
November 12th, 1993
- Ontario Trial Lawyers Association (OTLA) - The Loss of Earnings
Capacity Benefit - An overview - May 31st, 1996
- Ontario Trial Lawyers Association (OTLA), Conference co chair -
Winning Strategies For Litigators -May 31, - June 1, 1996
- Ontario Trial Lawyers Association (OTLA) - Bill 59 Procedures
under the new Bill 59 Insurance Bill - October 25th, 1996
- The Law Society of Upper Canada - Civil Litigation for Law
Clerks - Motions and Applications Workshop lecturer - November 8th,
1996
- Halton County Law Association - Procedures under the new
insurance bill 59 - 1997
- Ontario Trial Lawyers Association (OTLA) new lawyers division -
Ontario Insurance Commission - Arbitration Hearings before the
Ontario Insurance Commission - December 17, 1997
- Hamilton General Hospital - Bill 59 - Introduction to the new
insurance bill - April 6, 1998
- Ontario Trial Lawyers Association (OTLA) - Loss of Earnings
Capacity Benefit - Gan v. Lehman - May 23, 1998
- Burlington Executive Network - Introduction to Car Insurance in
Ontario - June 9, 1998
- Board of Trade Club - Neurotrauma: The Next Decade,
Implications for Rehabilitation and Long Term Community Needs under
Bill 59 -June 12, 1998
- Ontario Trial Lawyers Association (OTLA), Conference Co-Chair -
Persuasion For a New Millennium: Techniques, Tactics and Strategies
- November 5-7, 1998
- Burlington Executive Network - Employer / Employee Liquor
Liability - Jacobsen v. Nike Canada Inc. - September 14, 1999
- Television Program - Taking Care of Your Future -Liquor
Liability - December 13, 2000
- Burlington Chamber of Commerce - Liquor Liability - June 12,
2001
- Legal Education Society of Alberta - Liquor Liability -
Taverns, Employers and Private Individuals - June 25, 2001
- Television Program - Taking Care of Your Future - Liquor
liability and entertaining at Christmas - December 12, 2001
- C. H. Norton Public School - Career Day - Guest Speaker - April
10, 2002
- Halton County Law Association, Conference Co-chair - Simplified
Procedures - January 31, 2003
- Martin & Hillyer, Staff Training Seminar - The New PAF
Treatment Guidelines for Motor Vehicle Insurance - January 15,
2004
- Ontario Bar Association - Conducting a Civil Action Efficiently
and Effectively: Practical Strategies - ADR: A Tool of Limitless
Potential - June 11, 2004
- Ontario Trial Lawyers Association (OTLA) - Tavern Liability -
Intentional Torts Primer - October 25, 2007
- Osgoode Professional Development - Tavern Liability and Motor
Vehicle Accidents -
April 22nd, 2009
- Halton County Law Association - New Rules of Civil Procedure
-
November 16, 2009
- The Hamilton Law Association - The 23rd Annual Joint Insurance
Seminar - Tavern Liability - The Plaintiff's Perspective.
December 10th 2009
- OTLA Spring Conference - The Beasley Bombshell (Changes to Rule
53.03), May 28, 2010
A sampling of cases argued by Stephen B.
Abraham:
Dryden (Litigation Guardian of) v. Campbell Estate,
[2001] O.J. No. 829
In Dryden v. Campbell Estate, Stephen along with Bruce Hillyer
and David Wands represented the Dryden family in a 25 day Trial.
Mr. Dryden was severely injured as a result of an impaired,
underaged driver who had just left a local tavern in the City of
Burlington. The underaged driver slammed into the car containing 14
year old Scott Dryden.
It is believed that this is the only case in Canada where an
individual has been found responsible for providing alcohol to
another person who later caused a motor vehicle accident. We were
also successful in advancing a claim against the tavern.
Stephen was also responsible for arguing the non-deductibility
of accident benefits and was successful in having a Judge make a
finding that an earlier case on point was wrongly decided.
For complete details click here.
Dryden (Litigation guardian of) v. Campbell Estate,
[2001] O.J. No. 4095
The Plaintiffs were successful in the Dryden v. Campbell Estate
matter and were paid costs throughout the litigation. Stephen
successfully argued that in addition to the payment of costs and
assessable disbursements, the Plaintiffs' lawyers should be paid a
premium to reflect the measure of success achieved and the risk
incurred by the Solicitors. Mr. Justice Cavarzan agreed with his
submissions and assessed a premium in the amount of
$100,000.00.
For complete details click here.
Lehman v. GAN Canada Insurance Company, [1997] OIC
A96-001417
In Lehman v. GAN Canada Insurance Company, Stephen argued the
first Loss of Earning Capacity Benefit case in Ontario. He was
successful in advocating on behalf of his client that he should
receive benefits at the rate of $310.21 per week despite the
initial position by GAN that he should receive zero.
Stephen also argued the first appeal with respect to the Loss of
Earning Capacity Benefit on behalf of Mr. Lehman
For complete details read Part I and Part II .
Stevenson v. Williams and Minister of Human
Resources Development [2002], CPP Pension Appeals Board, CP
16290
In Stevenson v. Williams and the Minister of Human Resources
Development, Stephen was retained to argue the appeal on Ms.
Stevenson's behalf. The Pension Appeals Board Hearing was conducted
in Toronto at which time new evidence was presented on behalf of
the Appellant. It should be pointed out that the earlier case was
lost and Ms. Stevenson was not awarded benefits. In granting
benefits to his client, the three Judges indicated that the
evidence that was presented was "overwhelming".
For complete details click here.
Walker v. Sun Shelters Industries Inc., [2006] O.J.
No. 2023
In Walker v. Sun Shelters Industries Inc., Stephen represented
the Plaintiffs and was successful in advocating an award of damages
at Trial. The Trial Judge agreed with Mr. Abraham's assessment of
the damages under all headings and awarded the Plaintiffs at the
exact amounts requested. Madam Justice Mossip went on to describe
the case as a "text book case on a Civil Trial".
For complete details click here.
D.M. and P.M. v. Dominion of
Canada
Stephen was retained by D.M and P.M. to represent them in
this FSCO arbitration. He acted as lead counsel in this case
where the insurer had denied that D.M. had been involved in an
"accident" in accordance with the definition sections of the
Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule. Stephen and Co-counsel
David Hayward were able to convince both the Arbitrator and the
Directors Delegate that D.M.'s devastating injuries did arise from
an accident thus entitling him to coverage. The case was
settled for a significant sum shortly after the appeal was
successfully argued.
For complete details read Part I and
Part
II.
Contact
Stephen Abraham